ADVERTISEMENT
On Thursday, Brussels and Washington finally released the long-awaited joint statement solidifying the trade deal they agreed to nearly a month ago. The statement confirms that cars, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals will be subject to a maximum 15% tariff to enter the US.
The statement, like the deal struck on 27 July in Scotland between European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump, is not legally binding. However, it emphasizes that the reduction of tariffs for cars “will apply in tandem with the EU initiating the procedures for tariff reductions vis-à-vis US products”.
A customs duty rate of 27.5% currently still applies on EU cars and car parts.
Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič informed reporters that the Commission has a “firm intention” to present the legislative proposal and start the process before the end of the month. In such a case, he added, the 15% rate would apply retroactively as of 1 August.
The document also mentions that as of 1 September, unavailable natural resources (such as cork), all aircraft and aircraft parts, generic pharmaceuticals, and their ingredients and chemical precursors, and advanced technology products, will benefit from a special regime, with only normal non-discriminatory tariffs (MFN) applying.
Only MFN tariffs currently apply to pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, with the 15% rate set to kick in only if the US decides to raise duties following the conclusion of 232 investigations.
Wine, steel, and defence equipment
Wines and spirits, to the disappointment of some EU countries like France, do not seem to be on the list of exempted products, although the Commission emphasizes “both sides agree to continue to ambitiously work to extend this regime to other product categories – a key deliverable for the EU”.
Šefčovič stressed to reporters that the EU “have been very clear this is very important for us”.
No agreement appears to have been reached on steel and aluminium, with the current 50% tariff rate still applying to EU exports.
The statement only mentions that the two sides “intend” to work together to address global challenges in the sector, such as overcapacity, and to work on “secure supply chains between each other including through a tariff rate quota solution for EU exports of steel and aluminium, and their derivative products”.
A senior Commission official speaking on condition of anonymity stressed that there is no specific timeline for the two sides to agree on tariff quotas for steel and aluminium.
EU companies commit to buying US energy products worth $750 billion (€644 billion) through 2028 and to invest an additional $600 billion across strategic sectors.
The EU also commits to “substantially increase” procurement of US military and defence equipment. Commission officials argued this did not go against the bloc’s plan to massively ramp up its own defence industrial base before the end of the decade, as the efforts won’t bear fruit “overnight” and member states will need to “work with partners around the world” in the meantime.
They also highlighted that unlike for energy products and investments in strategic sectors, “no specific commitment” in terms of spending was included in the text.
The EU, which initially vowed not to compromise on its regulatory autonomy, also agreed to adjust three pieces of legislation that Washington had flagged as problematic: the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
‘Awful, total capitulation’
Šefčovič, who spent 100 hours negotiating with his US counterparts over the past two months, insisted that “this is the most favourable trade deal the US has extended to any partner”.
He described it as a first step which “strengthens” economic ties between the two parties “even further” and brings “stability and predictability to our relationship, to things that matter deeply, to our businesses”.
“It also strengthens our broader transatlantic partnership, which is more important than ever in today’s complex geopolitical landscape,” he added.
Von der Leyen and her counterpart at the European Council, Antonio Costa, both welcomed the joint statement, stressing that it provides “predictability” and “stability”.
EU ambassadors, briefed earlier on Thursday morning on the content of the joint statement by the Commissioner, largely had positive reactions, according to an EU diplomat.
However, a former EU official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, told Euronews that the joint statement is “awful, total capitulation”.
He argued, “There’s no reciprocity,” and US tariffs are 15%, EU goes to zero on all industrial goods.”
For Niclas Poitiers, a research fellow at Bruegel think tank, the deal remains a “very flawed agreement” that “significantly worsens the trade relationships for both parties compared to where we were last year”.
Its not legally binding nature also leaves it vulnerable to Trump’s mercurial policy-making.
He is someone that often changes his mind and I think we’re not completely out of the woods here. There’s always the likelihood that he might reopen part of this agreement,” Poitrie told Euronews.