New Zealand’s Minister for Resources, Shane Jones, is resolute in his stance on mining, declaring he will not be swayed by critics who present “apocalyptic images” of the industry’s environmental impact. As a member of the New Zealand First party, Jones aims to double mineral exports to $3 billion over the coming decade, driven by a desire to boost economic growth and reduce reliance on imported resources, even at the cost of certain environmental trade-offs. Jones rejects accusations of environmental neglect, arguing that opposing forces have an alternative vision for New Zealand that includes preserving the wilderness. He asserts that while some advocate for conservation, the economic stability provided by mining cannot be ignored, criticizing the disproportionate protection afforded to certain species. Critics, including Forest & Bird’s Nicola Toki, argue that the government’s approach to mining is at odds with New Zealand’s self-perceived identity as a protector of nature. Despite public protests and concerns over the degradation of the environment, which is rich in unique biodiversity, Jones remains unwavered, insisting that geopolitical changes necessitate a pragmatic approach to resource utilization. The minister also plans for future elections to include a campaign to alter the regulatory framework to further promote mining on conservation land. Others, such as Massey University geography professor Glenn Banks, suggest that the economic benefits of mining may be overstated, referencing the volatility of the industry and questioning the alignment of New Zealand’s critical minerals list with international standards. The opposition Labour party’s resources spokesperson, Megan Woods, decries the fast-track process for mining approvals, arguing it bypasses necessary environmental assessments and public scrutiny, potentially harming New Zealand’s reputation and social license for mining.
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/may/26/new-zealand-resources-minister-shane-jones-mining-environment
